Meraj Ahamad v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 17055 of 2023 Petitioner :- Meraj Ahamad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shashi Kant Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- CSC Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J. Heard Sri Shashi Kant Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Santosh Kumar Mishra, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for respondents. The case of the writ petitioner is that he seeks transfer to the district Gorakhpur however he has been transferred on 28.6.2023 to Naugarh Siddharth Nagar in one of the Government Institute. Prayer in the present petition is for a direction for consideration of the claim of his father. Sri Santosh Kumar Mishra, learned Standing Counsel submits that the pleadings in the writ petition are absolutely lacking with regard to the tenure of the writ petitioner in district Deoria and further there are certain family problems attributable for seeking transfer then it is the Director of Training and Employment, Guru Govind Singh Marg, Lucknow, U.P. who shall look into the said aspect, the writ petitioner may represent his cause. He further submits that he does not propose to file any response to the writ petition. Considering the submissions of the rival parties as well as stand taken by them, the writ petition is being disposed off without seeking any response from the respondents granting liberty to the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with the self-attested copy of the writ petition before the second respondent, Director of Training and Employment, Guru Govind Singh Marg, Lucknow, U.P. who shall on the receipt of the same, proceed to decide the claim of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of presentation of the certified copy of the order without being obsessed or influenced by any of the observations made herein and indicate the second respondent firm the opinion the matter needs to be decided by the some other authority then the paper be transmitted to it . Needless to point out that the writ petition has been decided without seeking any response from the respondents. Thus, passing of this order may not be construed to an expression that this Court has gone into the merits of the case. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed off. Order Date :- 18.10.2023 piyush High Court of Judicature at Allahabad