- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 17 October 2023
- Case no.
- CMRA 347/2021
Judgment
Court No. - 32 Case :- CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION No. - 347 of 2021 Applicant :- Noor Ahmad @ Chand And 2 Others Opposite Party :- Board Of Revenue And 4 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Srivastava,Mukhtar Alam Counsel for Opposite Party :- C.S.C.,Ramesh Kumar Shukla Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J. Heard Shri Arvind Srivastava, the counsel for the review applicant. No grounds for review are made out. The withdrawal of the proceedings instituted under Section 229-B of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 do not affect the merits of the order dated 08.09.2021 because an additional reason has been given in the order dated
08.09.2021 to support the said order which is that the father of the deceased had not challenged the mutation orders during his lifetime. It also comes out from the records that the father of the deceased was a witness to the Will executed by the deceased. The application is dismissed. Order Date :- 18.10.2023 Vipasha High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.