- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 17 October 2023
- Case no.
- CRLP 15517/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 45 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 15517 of 2023 Petitioner :- Subedar Pandey And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shireesh Kumar Dwivedi,Anshul Kumar Singhal Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
¶1Heard Shri Anshul Kumar Singhal, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Vivek Shukla, learned A.G.A for the State respondents.
¶2The relief sought in this petition is for quashing of the F.I.R. dated 07.02.2023, registered as Case Crime No. 60 of 2023, under Sections 419, 420 I.P.C., Police Station Meja, District Prayagraj. Further prayer has been made not to arrest the petitioners in the aforesaid case.
¶3Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the informant is the recorded tenure holder of Gata No. 401 and he is not the owner of Gata No. 439 in question and he has lodged the impugned First Information Report without any locus and with mala fide intention. It is submitted that the petitioners are in possession over the land in question since 1985 and they were validly awarded Patta of an area of 0.0170 hectares land by the Land Management Committee and a competent authority has also approved the same, as such no offence under Sections 419, 420 I.P.C. is made out.
¶4Per contra, learned A.G.A., on instructions, submits that an enquiry was conducted and the report has also been submitted that the signatures on Patta is forged and, therefore, commission of a cognizable offence is made out.
¶5Perusal of the impugned First Information Report prima facie reveals commission of cognizable offence.
¶6Therefore, in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Haryana and others vs. Bhajan Lal and others, 1992 Supp. (1) SCC 335 and M/s Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra, AIR 2021 SC 1918 and in Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.3262/2021 (Leelavati Devi @ Leelawati & another vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh) decided on 07.10.2021, no case has been made out for interference with the impugned first information report.
¶7The writ petition is dismissed Order Date :- 18.10.2023 Shafique High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.