VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sundar Lal v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
16 October 2023
Case no.
WRIC 35993/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35993 of 2023 Petitioner :- Sundar Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Tirpathi,Mahendra Kumar Shukla,Vijay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.

¶1Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary corrections in the memo of petition regarding array of parties during the course of the day and implead the new respondent.

¶2Heard Shri Vijay Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Uttara Bahuguna, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

¶3The petitioner has prayed for a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing/commanding the respondent no. 2 to decide the representation dated 18.06.2021 within stipulated time.

¶4In pith and substance, the petitioner is confined his prayer that his representation/application dated 18.06.2021 which is moved before Superintendent of Police, District-Rampur for redressal of his grievance may be decided expeditiously. He submits that as the private respondents had instituted an Original Suit for injunction bearing O.S. No. 32 of 2005 and the same was rejected by the court below vide judgement and order dated 04.04.2014 and at no point of time, the same has been assailed to higher forum. Counsel for the petitioner further submits that the respondents have no right, title or claim but, they are harassing the petitioner.

¶5Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel very fairly submits that, in case, any such representation is pending, the same would be decided by the concerned authority.

¶6Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue and with the consent of counsel for the parties, the writ petition stands disposed of, in case, the petitioner moves a fresh representation before the concerned Sub-Divisional Magistrate within a week's time, the same would be considered and decided by the concerned authority on merits strictly in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, but certainly after giving opportunity to all the stakeholders in the matter. Order Date :- 17.10.2023 Rama Kant High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.