VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Smt. Manju v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
17 October 2023
Case no.
WRIC 35271/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35271 of 2023 Petitioner :- Smt. Manju Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ayub Khan,Ainul Haq Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Arun Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.

¶1Heard Sri Ayub Khan, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Ajay Kumar Barnawal, learned Standing counsel for respondent no. 1 to 3.

¶2The present petition has been preferred for seeking direction in nature of certiorari to quash the impugned judgment and order dated 06.09.2023 passed by learned Commissioner, Moradabad Division, Moradabad/respondent no. 2 in Revision no. 1538/2023, computerised case no. C202313000001538 (Smt. Manju vs. Tukki Singh) under Section 219 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, order dated : 13.07.2023 & 28.07.2008 passed by Additional District Magistrate (Finance & Revenue), Sambhal/respondent no. 3.

¶3Considering the nature of matter, provision of issue notice to private respondents is dispensed with.

¶4The only arguments raised by learned counsel for petitioner is that the entire proceeding whatsoever has been initiated in pursuance to the application preferred by respondent no. 5 under Section 28 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 has been decided and culminated ex parte and the same has been endorsed at the level of the revision preferred by petitioner and decided vide order dated

06.09.2023 which impugned the present petition.

¶5Once this fact has been revealed and admitted by the authorities that at no point of time, the petitioner has been heard over the application preferred which might adversely affect the rights and possession of the petitioner over plot pertains to him, it was mandatory on the part of the revenue authorities to provide proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

¶6In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances, order dated 06.09.2023 passed by respondent no. 2 and 13.07.2023 &

28.07.2008 passed by respondent no. 3 is hereby set aside. Matter is remitted back to respondent no. 3 for deciding afresh within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order and after affording proper opportunity of hearing to all the parties.

¶7Writ petition stands allowed accordingly. Order Date :- 18.10.2023 Shaswat High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.