VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Munesh Devi v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
17 October 2023
Case no.
WRIC 35015/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35015 of 2023 Petitioner :- Munesh Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Pratap Singh Raghav Counsel for Respondent :- CSC,S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.

¶1At the very outset, learned counsel for petitioner prays for and is allowed to implead Gaon Sabha as necessary party in the array of parties which was inadvertently left at the time of institution of petition. Necessary incorporation shall be carried out during course of the day.

¶2Heard Sri Anil Pratap Singh Raghav, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Sri Krishna Kant Singh, learned counsel for Gaon Sabha.

¶3Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus to be issued in favour of the respondent no.2 to decide restoration application dated 15.05.2019 in Case No. 8/98, Computerized Case No. D20081820038 (Krishna Kumar vs. Khajan Singh and others), under Section 198(4) of U.P. Z.A & L.R. Act expeditiously.

¶4Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would sufficiently be met in case, the aforesaid restoration application dated

15.5.2019 is considered and decided in a time bound manner by respondent no. 2.

¶5Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and an appropriate direction may be issued to respondent no.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner.

¶6Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case as well as if there is no other legal impediment available, the respondent no.2 is hereby directed to consider and decide restoration application dated 15.05.2019 in Case No. 8/98, Computerized Case No. D20081820038 (Krishna Kumar vs. Khajan Singh and others), under Section 198(4) of U.P. Z.A & L.R. Act, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to all the parties.

¶7With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 18.10.2023 Shaswat High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.