- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 18 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIA 17306/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 17306 of 2023 Petitioner :- Mahesh Kumar Baghel Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Sagar Yadav,Rajnesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the parties.
¶2Petitioner is aggrieved by transfer order dated 30.06.2023 and claims to have been relieved on 21.09.2023 whereas his transfer is in violation of the transfer policy dated
07.06.2023.
¶3Learned Standing Counsel submits that the petitioner has challenged the transfer order dated 30.06.2023 which is general in nature and interference with the said order may have adverse effect upon the other employee's who have been transferred under the said order. Transfer being exigency in service, this Court may not interfere into it.
¶4Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, I find there to be no good ground to interfere with the order of transfer passed in administrative exigency.
¶5At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already represented the matter before the competent authority on 10.09.2023 but the same has not been paid heed to.
¶6In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with direction to the respondent authorities to look into and consider the claim of the petitioner as raised in his representation dated 10.09.2023 and decide the same as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Order Date :- 19.10.2023/Deepika High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.