VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Mukesh Yadav v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
18 October 2023
Case no.
WRIC 26312/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 49 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26312 of 2023 Petitioner :- Mukesh Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Alkesh Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.

¶1Heard Sri Alkesh Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Dinesh Kumar Verma, learned standing counsel for the State-respondent nos. 1 to 3.

¶2By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Tahsildar, Tehsil - Kurawali, District Mainpuri (respondent no. 3) to decide the Mutation Case No. 955 of 2018 (Mukesh Yadav Vs. Kanti Devi), Case No. 1030 of 2019 (Mukesh Yadav Vs. Kanti Devi) and 2722 of 2022 (Mukesh Yadav Vs. Ramesh Babu).

¶3This Court vide order dated 4.10.2023 granted time to the learned standing counsel to seek instructions in the matter.

¶4Sri Dinesh Kumar Verma, learned standing counsel submits that he has received instructions dated 17.10.2023 from the Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil Kurawali, District Mainpuri.

¶5On the basis of aforesaid written instructions, learned standing counsel submits that all the three cases namely Case No. 955 of 2018 (Mukesh Yadav Vs. Kanti Devi) has been decided vide order dated 12.10.2023, Case No. 2722 of 2022 (Mukesh Yadav Vs. Ramesh Babu) has been decided vide order dated

05.10.2023 and Case No. 1030 of 2019 (Mukesh Yadav Vs. Kanti Devi) has been decided vide order dated 07.10.2023.

¶6Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner does not dispute the above noted statement made by the learned standing counsel. However, he submits that the copy of the said orders have not been received by him till date.

¶7Taking into consideration the aforesaid statement made by learned standing counsel, this Court is of the view that nothing is left for adjudication in the present writ petition and the writ petition has lost its efficacy.

¶8Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Order Date :- 19.10.2023 Arif High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.