- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 18 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 35384/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35384 of 2023 Petitioner :- Mohammad Sajid Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Firdos Ahmad,Pawan Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Chetan Chatterjee Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Manoj Bajaj,J.
¶1The petitioner had been served with a bill/demand notice dated
29.6.2023. He had objected to the demand notice on 7.7.2023.
¶2Learned counsel for the Electricity Department states that if the petitioner applies afresh under Clause 6.15 of the Electricity Supply Code, 2005 in accordance with the provisions contained therein then the same shall be considered by the department in accordance with law.
¶3In such circumstances, it is provided that if the petitioner moves an application afresh under Clause 6.15 of the Electricity Supply Code, 2005 within the next one month from today alongwith a certified copy of this order, then the same shall be considered and decided in a month from the date of filing of the application.
¶4For a period of two months, no recovery shall be pressed against the petitioner.
¶5With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 19.10.2023 S.K.S. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.