Anwar Ahmad v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 31333 of 2023 Petitioner :- Anwar Ahmad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Saurabh Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Baleshwar Chaturvedi,Kartikeya Saran,Ravi Anand Agarwal,Surya Prakash Pandey Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Standing Counsel for State respondents; Shri Ravi Anand Agarwal, learned counsel for Electricity Department and Shri Surya Prakash Pandey, learned counsel for respondent no.4.

¶2Present writ petition has been preferred for a direction to respondent no.3 to install separate transformer for supplying the electricity in the tubewell of respondent no.4 and for a further direction to respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 25.8.2023 within stipulated period.

¶3The allegation of the petitioner is that his tubewell is not getting proper supply of electricity as from the same transformer the electricity is being supplied to the tubewell of respondent no.4.

¶4On the matter being taken up today, learned counsel for the Electricity Department has produced the instruction dated

9.10.2023 sent by the concerned Executive Engineer, which is taken on record. On the basis of instruction, it is submitted that on inspection it was found that proper electricity is being supplied in the tubewell of the petitioner and as such no interference is required in the matter.

¶5Considering the facts and circumstances as well as the categorical instruction, we are not inclined to interfere in the matter. The writ petition being misconceived is dismissed. Order Date :- 19.10.2023 SP/ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad