- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 18 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 25135/2023
Judgment
Chief Justice's Court Case :- WRIT - C No. - 25135 of 2023 Petitioner :- Sanjay Pandey And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Neelabh Srivastava,Sumit Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sunil Dutt Kautilya Hon'ble Pritinker Diwaker,Chief Justice Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Undisputably, a civil suit between the parties is pending. Simultaneously, an application for mutation has been filed before respondent no.3. Grievance of the petitioners is that their mutation application has not been decided since last eight months. He submits that a direction may be issued to respondent no.3 for deciding mutation proceedings expeditiously. Counsel appearing for respondent no.3 submits that unless the civil suit is decided, the mutation proceedings cannot be decided. Be that as it may, once the proceedings are pending before the Competent Authority, the said Authority is obliged to pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, considering the all facts and circumstances of the case, after giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. It is made clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 19.10.2023 CS/- (Ajay Bhanot, J.) (Pritinker Diwaker, C.J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.