- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 18 October 2023
- Case no.
- FAFOD 1066/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 7 Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 1066 of 2023 Appellant :- Smt. Chanda Pandey Respondent :- Jitesh Chaurasiya And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Kuldeep Kumar,Dileep Kumar Shukla Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. Heard Sri Kuldeep Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant. Present appeal has been preferred under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and award dated
03.02.2022 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Banda in Claim Petition No. 182/79 of 2019. The Stamp Reporter has submitted a report pointing out that the appeal is not maintainable in view of the provisions under Section 173 (1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Counsel for the appellant has not disputed that the appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 would not lie when the amount in dispute is less than Rs. 1 lakh. Learned counsel accordingly states that he does not wish to press the appeal. The appeal stands dismissed accordingly. Office to return the amount of statutory deposit made by the appellant. Order Date :- 19.10.2023 Sachdeva (Dr. Y. K. Srivastava, J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.