Surendra and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Court No. - 86 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 36841 of 2023 Applicant :- Surendra And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vipul Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.

1.Supplemetary affidavit filed on behalf of the applicants today in Court, is taken on record.

¶2Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶3This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 1705 of 2022 (Smt. Neelam Singh Vs. Dinesh and others), under Sections 323, 504, 506, 452 IPC, Police Station-Badshahinaka, District-Kanpur Nagar, pending in the court of Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate-I, Kanpur Nagar.

¶4After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants has made a statement at the Bar, on instructions, that he does not want to press other prayers made in the instant application and states that the applicants are ready to appear before the court below and seek their bail and that their release be considered in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51.

¶5Per contra, learned AGA states that he has no objection to the aforesaid prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant for not pressing the other prayers made in the instant application.

¶6In view of the above, in case the applicants appear before the court below within three weeks from today and seek bail, their release be considered in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51.

¶7With the aforesaid observations, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed off. Order Date :- 19.10.2023 KU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad