- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 18 October 2023
- Case no.
- CRLP 15602/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 45 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 15602 of 2023 Petitioner :- Nadeem And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nirbhay Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
¶1Heard Shri Nirbhav Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri G.P. Singh, learned A.G.A for the State respondents.
¶2The relief sought in this petition is for quashing of the F.I.R. dated
10.08.2023, registered as Case Crime No. 0231 of 2023, under Sections 363, 366 IPC, Police Station Patiyali, District Kasganj. Further prayer has been made not to arrest the petitioner in the aforesaid case.
¶3Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case, the victim was never enticed away by the petitioners, the informant and the entire family members of the petitioners are resident of same village and due to political rivalry they have been implicated.
¶4Per contra, learned AGA pointed out that age of the victim is 14 years and she is still missing, as such, cognizable offence has been made out.
¶5Perusal of the impugned first information report prima facie reveals commission of cognizable offence.
¶6Therefore, in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Haryana and others vs. Bhajan Lal and others, 1992 Supp. (1) SCC 335 and M/s Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra, AIR 2021 SC 1918 and in Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.3262/2021 (Leelavati Devi @ Leelawati & another vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh) decided on 07.10.2021, no case has been made out for interference with the impugned first information report.
¶7The present petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 19.10.2023 Ujjawal High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.