Dinesh Chandra Tiwari v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 17878 of 2023 Petitioner :- Dinesh Chandra Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jata Shankar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- CSC Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.

¶1By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for following relief: "I) A writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to give notional increment and to revise the pension accordingly."

¶2It transpires from the record that in the above regard, petitioner has already represented the matter to the respondent no.3, namely, Director Vigilence, U.P. Lucknow, on 28.09.2023 but the same has not been paid heed to.

¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner has also relied upon a direction issued by the Court in the case of Jagvir Singh Rohilla vs. State of U.P. and 2 others, Writ A No.5959 of 2019.

¶4Learned Standing Counsel states that the petitioner may make a representation as advised and the same may be considered and disposed of in accordance with law.

¶5In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with direction to the petitioner to file a representation with respect to his prayer as made above within a period of two weeks from today. In the event any such representation is filed, the same shall be looked into and considered by the respondent no.3,namely, Director Vigilence, U.P. Lucknow within a further period of two months. Order Date :- 26.10.2023 Deepika High Court of Judicature at Allahabad