Ram Nagina Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh and 8 Others

Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36704 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ram Nagina Yadav Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pavan Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.

¶1Heard Sri Pavan Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents no.1 and 2.

¶2Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus to be issued in favour of the respondent no.2 to decide Appeal No.83/, Computer No.C202215000001266 (Ram Nagina Yada Vs. Rajendra and others), under Section 38(4) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.

¶3Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would sufficiently be met in case, the aforesaid matter is considered and decided in a time bound manner.

¶4Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and an appropriate direction may be issued to respondent no.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner.

¶5Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case as well as if there is no other legal impediment available, the respondent no.2 is hereby directed to consider and decide the Appeal No.83/, Computer No.C202215000001266 (Ram Nagina Yada Vs. Rajendra and others), under Section 38(4) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of nine months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him after affording proper opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties.

¶6With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 26.10.2023/Vivek Kr. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad