VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Shatrudhan Chaurasiya and Another v. State of U.P. and 6 Others

Dismissed on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
25 October 2023
Case no.
WRIC 36544/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 47 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36544 of 2023 Petitioner :- Shatrudhan Chaurasiya And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gautam,Manoj Kumar Singh,Mohd. Shamim Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sudhir Bharti Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

¶2The present petition has been filed seeking following main relief :- "i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing/commanding the Respondent authorities to remove the illegal encroachment and dispossess the respondent Nos. 6 & 7 from the Gaon Sabha Land bearing Plot No. 268Ga/0.0240 hec. recorded as banzar land in the revenue record in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Jagpal Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and others, reported in 2011(113)RD 329."

¶3Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that petitioner has an alternative remedy to approach appropriate authority by moving an application under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 in view of the judgment passed by this Court in Jahar Singh v. State of U.P. reported in 2017(4) ADJ

619.

¶4Since the petitioner has an alternative remedy, this Court is not inclined to entertain the instant petition.

¶5In case, the petitioner moves an application under Section 67 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 before appropriate authority, the same shall be considered and decided after hearing all the concerned parties, in accordance with law.

¶6With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 26.10.2023 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.