- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 25 October 2023
- Case no.
- WPIL 2092/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 47 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2092 of 2023 Petitioner :- Bhwani Shankar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sudhir Bharti Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.
¶2The instant writ petition has been filed for expediting the Case No. 62/69, T-314252 (Gaon Sabha v. Santram Pandey), under Section 122B of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act.
¶3Learned Standing Counsel submitted that the petitioner is neither party to the aforesaid proceedings nor a person aggrieved, therefore, the writ petition at his behest is not maintainable.
¶4In view of the above, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter.
¶5Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
¶6Since the aforesaid case is pending since long, I hope and trust that the same will be decided expeditiously in accordance with law. Order Date :- 26.10.2023 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.