VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Malti Devi v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
25 October 2023
Case no.
WRIC 36603/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36603 of 2023 Petitioner :- Malti Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla,J.

¶1Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

¶2This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with at prayer to issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of Mandamus directing to the respondent no.2 to decide the representation dated

21.09.2022 under the scheme of Mukhyamantri Kisan Evam Sarvhit Beema Yojana and pass compensation of the death claim within stipulated period as fixed by this Court.

¶3It is contended by learned Counsel for the petitioner that the representation filed by the petitioner on 21.09.2022 under the scheme of Mukhyamantri Kisan Evam Sarvhit Beema Yojana claiming compensation for the death of her husband, late Babu Lal before the respondent no.2 has not been decided till date.

¶4Learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents has no objection to the prayer so made.

¶5In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, we disposed of this writ petition with a direction to respondent no.2 to decide the representation dated 21.09.2022 filed by the petitioner, annexed as Annexure No.7 to the writ petition in accordance with law, by reasoned and speaking order expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order after affording opportunity of hearing to respondent nos.2. Order Date :- 26.10.2023 A. Pandey High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.