- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 26 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 33425/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 33425 of 2023 Petitioner :- Naveen Kumar Rupani Respondent :- Union Of India And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brahma Prakash Tripathi,Satya Prakash Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Chandra Prakash Yadav,Sandeep Kumar Singh Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Manoj Bajaj,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Sandeep Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the Bank and Sri Chandra Prakash Yadav, learned counsel for the Union of India.
¶2The instant petition was filed against the notices for auction dated 15.08.2023 and 21.08.2023. However, learned counsel for the petitioner states that after the filing of the writ petition, the petitioner and the Bank have entered into a one time settlement and, therefore, the petitioner does not wish to press the instant writ petition.
¶3Learned counsel for the Bank has no objection to the same.
¶4Under such circumstances, the instant writ petition is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. Order Date :- 27.10.2023 M.S. Ansari (Manoj Bajaj, J.) (Siddhartha Varma, J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.