VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ashwani @ Ashwani Kumar and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
25 October 2023
Case no.
A482 6886/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 69 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6886 of 2023 Applicant :- Ashwani @ Ashwani Kumar And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Akhilesh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Abhishek Kumar Singh Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.

¶1List revised.

¶2Heard Sri Ankit Yadav holding brief of Sri Akhilesh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Abhishek Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2, Sri Ajay Singh, learned A.G.A-1 for the State and perused the records.

¶3The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants Ashwani @ Ashwani Kumar, Rakshpal @ Raksh Pal Singh and Puspa @ Puspa Devi with the prayer to allow the present application and quash the summoning order dated 16.8.2022 in Criminal Complaint Case No.1443 of 2021, (Surabhi @ Mithlesh Vs. Ashwani and others) under Section 498-A, 323, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station Chandpa, District Hathras pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hathras and further to stay the further proceeding of the aforesaid case, during the pendency of present application.

¶4The matter was referred to the Mediation Centre of this Court vide order dated 24.2.2023 for making an effort between the parties for settling their disputes amicably.

¶5As per report of Mediation Centre dated 23.9.2023, the parties have entered into an settlement in view of interim settlement dated 26.8.2023 and have amicably settled their dispute and further agreed to withdraw the cases going on between them.

¶6As per the office report dated 26.10.2023, a report from the Mediation Centre of this Court is on record.

¶7From perusal of the report of Mediation Centre of this Court, it appears that in pursuance of the said order the mediation proceedings were taken up which ended in a settlement dated

23.9.2023 between the parties and the Mediation succeeded. The parties have settled their grievances and even the dispute arising out in the present matter.

¶8Learned counsel for the applicants states that a case under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act is pending before the concerned trial court. He prays that a direction for expeditious disposal of the same be given.

¶9The law with regards to quashing of a case on the basis of settlement arrived between the parties, is well settled. The Apex Court in the cases of (1) B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another: (2003)4 SCC 675; (2) Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation : (2008) 9 SCC 677; (3) Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others: ( 2008) 16 SCC 1; (4) Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab: (2012) 10 SCC 303; (5) Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. And another: 2013 (83) ACC 278 and (6) Parbatbhai Ahir@Parbatbhai @ Bhimsinbhai Karmur and others Vs. State of Gujarat and another: (2017) 9 SCC 641 has held that the cases in which the parties have settled their grievances can be quashed.

¶10From perusal of the records and the law laid down by the Apex Court on the subject matter, the present case is a good case for exercising powers by this Court to quash the proceedings as prayed for by the applicants.

¶11The present application is allowed.

¶12The proceedings of the present case as well as the summoning order/charge sheet in the aforesaid case are hereby quashed.

¶13However the Principal Judge, Family Court, Hathras is directed to expedite the hearing of the said case and decide the same within 45 days from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

¶14Office is directed to communicate this order to the concerned court within two weeks from today. (Samit Gopal, J.) Order Date :- 26.10.2023 Gaurav Kuls High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.