- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 26 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 34576/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 34576 of 2023 Petitioner :- Satish Chandra Yadav Respondent :- Authorized Officer / Chief Branch Manager, State Bank Of India And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Satish Chaturvedi Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Manoj Bajaj,J. Heard Sri Mukesh Kumar, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Sunil Kumar learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Pankaj Srivastava learned counsel for the Bank and the learned Standing Counsel. Learned counsel for the Bank Sri Pankaj Srivastava states that the petitioner has yet no cause of action for filing the writ petition as the petitioner in pursuance of the notice under Section 13(2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, can make good the demand which was made by the Bank. No interference is warranted. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Order Date :- 27.10.2023 PK (Manoj Bajaj,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.