- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 26 October 2023
- Case no.
- A482 37238/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 91 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 37238 of 2023 Applicant :- Bataso Devi And 8 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Vashistha Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Navaneet Kumar Shukla Hon'ble Gajendra Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. No one present on behalf of the opposite party no.2.
¶2This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants with the prayer to quash the charge sheet dated
06.05.2023 and summoning order dated 10.07.2023 as well as entire proceeding of Case Crime No.95 of 2023, under Sections 147, 148, 447, 452, 323, 504, 506, 427, 354-Kha IPC and Section 7/8 of POCSO Act, Police Station Dholna, District Kasganj.
¶3After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicants prays for withdrawal of this application with liberty to the applicants to file bail application before the court of competent jurisdiction.
¶4Learned A.G.A. has no objection to such request.
¶5In view of the above, the instant application is disposed of with liberty to the applicants to appear before court concerned within a period of four weeks from today and file appropriate application for bail, which shall be decided in the light of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No (s) 5191 of 2021, decided on
07.10.2021. Order Date :- 27.10.2023 Sanjeet High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.