Smt. Madhubala v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Court No. - 39 Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 1120 of 2023 Petitioner :- Smt. Madhubala Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunita Sharma,Vijay Chandra Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prince Kumar Srivastava,Rakesh Bahadur,Satyavrat Sahai Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J. Hon'ble Surendra Singh-I,J.

¶1Learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Chief Standing Counsel, Satyavrat Sahai, learned counsel for respondent no.3 and Shri Rakesh Bahadur, learned counsel for respondent no.4 are present.

¶2Petitioner claims that the assessment made is wholly disproportionate to the size of the property of the petitioner.

¶3Dispute brought before the Court is factual. In face of statutory remedy of appeal available, interference claim is declined.

¶4Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.

¶5It is however left open to the petitioner to avail his remedy of appeal, in accordance with law. Order Date :- 27.10.2023 Zafar (Surendra Singh-I,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad