Deendayal and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Court No. - 53 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8466 of 2023 Petitioner :- Deendayal And 3 Others Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Piyush Patel,Pradeep Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. This petition has been filed to set aside the order dated 11.05.2023, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Maharajganj in Criminal Revision No. 42 of 2023 (Deendayal and others Versus State of U.P. and another) as well as order dated 17.01.2023 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Farenda, Maharajganj in Complaint Case No.2578 of 2022 (Dinesh Versus Deendayal and others) under Sections 323, 392 and 427 I.P.C., Police Station Puranderpur, District Maharajganj. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that he is not pressing the petition for the prayer of setting aside impugned orders. He is confining his prayer only for direction of expeditious disposal of the bail application in view of guidelines propounded in Satender Kumar Antil Versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another)(2021) 10 SCC 773. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the applicants, the prayer for setting aside impugned orders is hereby refused. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is disposed of with a direction that if petitioners move bail application before the court concerned, it shall be decided expeditiously in accordance with settled principle of law propounded by Hon'ble Apex Court. Order Date :- 27.10.2023 MN/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad