Smt. Sunita v. State of U.P. and Another

Court No. - 88 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 32419 of 2023 Applicant :- Smt. Sunita Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Devesh Kumar Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J. 1-Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of U.P./opposite party No.1 and perused the record. 2-By means of this application, the applicant has prayed for expeditious disposal of case being Complaint Case No. 35372 of 2022 (Smt. Sunita Vs. Jagdish Prasad Sharma), under Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act, Police Station-Highway, District-Mathura, pending in the court of Presiding OfÏcer, Additional Court, Mathura within the time-bound frame. 3-It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is complainant in this case. On the complaint of the applicant, accused Jagdish Prasad Sharma was summoned vide order dated 30.09.2022 and he was released on bail vide order dated

10.04.2023. Thereafter, no effective proceeding is going on, on account of moving adjournment application by the accused and allowing the same by the trial court. 4-Learned Additional Government Advocate states that no useful purpose would be served in issuing notice to opposite party and keeping this application pending before this Court and it may be disposed of at this stage itself. 5-Considering the limited grievance of the learned counsel for the applicant, learned trial court is directed to make an endeavour to decide the aforesaid case, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before it, if there is no legal impediment. 6-With the aforesaid directions, this application is disposed of. Order Date :- 27.10.2023 Kashifa High Court of Judicature at Allahabad