- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 26 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIB 17270/1986
Judgment
Court No. - 48 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 17270 of 1986 Petitioner :- Rudra Pal Singh Respondent :- D.D.C. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Radhey Shyam,Satish Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- Sankatha Rai,Dr. Vinod Kumar Rai Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. Civil Misc. Substitution Application No.172731 of 2014 Heard. This is an application for substituting legal heirs of petitioner No.3. This application is allowed, subject to cost of Rs. 500/- to be deposited in cash in the office of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad and counsel for petitioner is directed to carry out necessary changes in cause title during the course of day. Civil Misc. Substitution Application No.172734 of 2014 Heard. This is an application for substituting legal heirs of respondent No.4/1. This application is allowed, subject to cost of Rs. 500/- to be deposited in cash in the office of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad at the risk of counsel for petitioner and he is directed to carry out necessary changes in cause title during the course of day. Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application No.3 of 2019 Heard. Cause shown is sufficient. Delay is condoned in filing substitution application. Application is allowed. Civil Misc. Substitution Application No.4 of 2019 Heard. This is an application for substituting legal heirs of respondent No.4/1/3. This application is allowed at the risk of counsel for petitioner and he is directed to carry out necessary changes in cause title during the course of day. Civil Misc. Substitution Application No.6 of 2019 Heard. This is an application for substituting legal heirs of respondent No.3/1. This application is allowed at the risk of counsel for petitioner and he is directed to carry out necessary changes in cause title during the course of day. Order on memo of petition Heard Sri Satish Dwivedi, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Dr. Vinod Kumar Rai, learned counsel for contesting respondents. Both counsel for parties submit that this matter be disposed of in terms of compromise at the risk of parties. This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. The contents of compromise will be at risk of parties and in case of any objection, parties have to bear the consequence thereof. Order Date :- 27.10.2023 P. Pandey High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.