- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 26 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIB 3125/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 48 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 3125 of 2023 Petitioner :- Rajendra Kumar Alias Raju And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sarita Dwivedi,Puran Nath Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
¶1According to office report, service upon respondents could be considered sufficient since neither AD nor undelivered cover was received back as well as compliance affidavit of dasti service has also been filed.
¶2Heard Sri P.N. Shukla, learned counsel for petitioners.
¶3In the present case, concurrent findings returned by Consolidation Officer as well as Settlement Officer of Consolidation in regard to validity of will deed has been upset by Revisional Authority in a very light manner without considering its factual and legal aspect.
¶4In view of above and since no one has entered appearance on behalf of respondents, therefore, there is no objection to aforesaid submission. Accordingly, impugned order dated 24.07.2023 is set aside and matter is remitted back to Deputy Director of Consolidation for fresh consideration.
¶5Aforesaid exercise shall be concluded within a period of six months from today.
¶6Writ petition stands partly allowed. Order Date :- 27.10.2023 Nirmal Sinha High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.