Hariom @ Atul Tiwari v. State of U.P.And 3 Others

Court No. - 64 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 44078 of 2023 Applicant :- Hariom @ Atul Tiwari Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Yogendra Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State.

¶2Learned A.G.A informs that notice has been served on opposite party no. 2 but no one has put in appearance on his behalf.

¶3There is allegation against the applicant of committing the offence under Section 376(2) IPC and Section 5m/5n/6 of POCSO Act. Subsequently, implication has been converted under section 376(B) IPC.

¶4Counsel for the applicant submits that it is a case of false implication. The applicant is related as brother-in-law (devar) of the informant. The victim is a minor girl aged about 10 years. The allegation that the applicant committed the alleged offence is not borne out from the material on record. The medical report of the victim does not supports the prosecution case at all. It is submitted that on account of dispute between the family members who are closely related the present implication has been made. The applicant stated to be Sewadar in a temple. He is in jail since

19.04.2023 and has no criminal history to his credit.

¶5On the other hand learned A.G.A has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶6Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused; submissions of the learned counsel for the parties noted above; finding force in the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant; keeping view the uncertainty regarding conclusion of trial; one sided investigation by police, ignoring the case of accused side; applicant being under-trial having fundamental right to speedy trial; larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India; considering the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil vs. C.B.I., passed in S.L.P (Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021; considering 5-6 times overcrowding in jails over and above their capacity by the under trials and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶7Let the applicant, Hariom @ Atul Tiwari, involved in Case Crime No. 138 of 2023 (S.C. No. 971 of 2023), under Sections-376(B) IPC and Section 5m/5n/6 of POCSO Act, Police Station-Akabarpur, District-Kanpur Dehat, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses.

(ii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

(iii) The applicant shall remain present before the Trial Court on each date fixed, either personally or as directed by the Court. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

(iv) In case the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation then the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him in accordance with law under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

(v) The applicant shall remain present in person before the Trial Court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶8In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶9Identity and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. Order Date :- 28.10.2023 Rohit High Court of Judicature at Allahabad