VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Satendra Bahadur Srivastava and 11 Others v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
26 October 2023
Case no.
WRIC 36904/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 51 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36904 of 2023 Petitioner :- Satendra Bahadur Srivastava And 11 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajeet Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rajesh Kumar Dwivedi, State-Law Officer for the State-respondents.

¶2The instant petition has been filed for mandamus directing the respondent no.2 i.e. Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Goshi, District-Mau to decide the Case No.1284

of

2016,

Computerized

Case No.T20161551021284 (Satyendra Bahadur & Others vs. Gorakhnath & Others), under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within stipulated period.

¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the aforementioned case under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is pending before respondent no.2 since

16.5.2015. He further submitted that the copy of order sheet of the case has been annexed as Annexure No.2 to the petition in order to demonstrate that the case is not proceeding according to the provisions contained under Rule 109 (10) of U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016.

¶4Without expressing any opinion on merits of the case and keeping in view of the facts and circumstances, respondent no.2/Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Ghosi, Mau is directed to decide the aforementioned case on merits after giving an opportunity of hearing to the parties in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before him.

¶5Accordingly, the writ petition is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 27.10.2023 Rameez High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.