Sharad @ Sharad Prayash v. State of U.P. and Another

Court No. - 86 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 32465 of 2023 Applicant :- Sharad @ Sharad Prayash Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶2This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the summoning order dated

24.10.2018 as well as entire proceedings of Special Case No. 65 of 2017 (State Vs. Raju Thakur), arising out of Case Crime No. 0629 of 2016, under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, Police Station Bidhuna, District Auraiya, pending in the court of Additional Sessions Judge/ Special Judge (POCSO Act), Auraiya.

¶3After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant has made a statement at the Bar, on instructions, that he does not want to press other prayers made in the instant application and states that the applicant is ready to appear before the court below and seek his bail and that his release be considered in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51.

¶4Per contra, learned AGA states that he has no objection to the aforesaid prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant for not pressing the other prayers made in the instant application.

¶5In view of the above, in case the applicant appears before the court below within three weeks from today and seeks bail, his release be considered in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51.

¶6With the aforesaid observations, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 28.10.2023/Nadim High Court of Judicature at Allahabad