Seetaram Rajput @ Seetaram v. State of U.P. and Another

Court No. - 68 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 252 of 2023 Applicant :- Seetaram Rajput @ Seetaram Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vimal Kumar Pandey,Sakshi Jaiswal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Fakhruzzaman Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶1Case called out. None appears for the applicant to press the bail application, although the name of the learned counsel for the applicant has been shown in the cause list. However, Shri Fakhruzzaman, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 is present.

¶2The instant bail cancellation application has been moved on behalf of the informant for cancelling the bail granted to the accused-opposite party no.2 in Case Crime No. 0104 of 2021, under Section 376-D I.P.C., Police Station Konch, District Jalaun.

¶3It has been contended on behalf of applicant-informant in the affidavit accompanying to the present bail application that the accused-opposite party no.2 was granted bail subject to the conditions contained in the bail order, however, the accused-opposite party no.2 after released from jail started making pressure and giving threatening to the applicant to compromise the matter and in this regard, the applicant-informant moved an application before the court concerned under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. on

02.03.2023 which has been decided by the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalaun at Orai and treated the same as a complaint case, copy of which is annexed as Annexure-19 to the affidavit accompanying the bail application.

¶4Learned A.G.A. submits that the informant has a remedy available under the Witness Protection Scheme Scheme, 2018 and thus the instant bail cancellation application may be disposed of in the light of protection granted to the witnesses under the Witness Protection Scheme, 2018.

¶5In view of the submissions made by learned A.G.A., this Court is of the opinion, that the applicant has remedy available to him under Witness Protection Scheme, 2018, which scheme has been approved by Hon'ble Apex Court in Mahender Chawla and others Vs. Union of India reported in (2019) 14 SCC 615.

¶6Accordingly, present bail cancellation application is disposed of with a direction, in case, the informant-applicant moves appropriate application on the proforma prescribed in the Witness Protection Scheme 2018 alongwith a certified copy of this order for redressal of his grievances, as raised in the instant bail cancellation application, before the competent authority as has been defined under Section 2 (c) of the Witness Protection Scheme, 2018 within a week from today, same shall be considered and decided as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of one month from date of filing such application, strictly in accordance with the Witness Protection Scheme 2018. Order Date :- 28.10.2023 Mustaqeem. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad