- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 27 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 37031/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37031 of 2023 Petitioner :- Mayank Rawat Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ichhvaku Pratap Shahi,Deepesh Kumar Ojha,Himanshu Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla,J.
¶1After substantial argument, once the Court has declined to entertain the writ petition on the ground of locus and inclined to dismiss the writ petition with exemplary cost, confronted with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not inclined to press the present writ petition, the same may be dismissed as not pressed.
¶2Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
¶3This order has been passed with the assistance of learned Standing Counsel. Order Date :- 28.10.2023 Puspendra High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.