- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 27 October 2023
- Case no.
- A482 38588/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 92 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 38588 of 2023 Applicant :- Pramod Kumar Pandey @ Kallu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dhirendra Babu Mishra,Abhishek Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.
¶1Heard Sri Abhishek Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Prem Prakash Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State.
¶2The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking quashing of the charge-sheet dated 28.07.2021 as well as impugned cognizance/summoning order dated
21.08.2021 in Case No. 1345 of 2021 (State vs. Pramod Kumar Pandey @ Kallu), arising out of Case Crime No. 159 of 2021 u/S 411, 412, 420, 468, 471 I.P.C., P.S.- Paschim Sharira, District-Kaushambi, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Kaushambi.
¶3Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he has been falsely implicated in the case by the police and he has not committed any theft as has been alleged in the instant F.I.R. against the applicant. However, on repeated asking, learned counsel for the applicant has failed to submit as to why the police has chosen the applicant herein for false implication.
¶4In view thereof and for want of any explanation on behalf of the applicant, this Court do not find any illegality in the charge-sheet or the cognizance/summoning order against the applicant.
¶5In view thereof, the instant application is devoid of merits and is hereby dismissed. Order Date :- 28.10.2023 Shubham Arya High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.