Smt.Anjali and 4 Others v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Court No. - 45 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16836 of 2023 Petitioner :- Smt.Anjali And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Akhil Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.

¶1Heard Sri Akhil Kumar Shukla alogwith Sri Neeraj Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri G.P. Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶2This writ petition has been filed praying to quash the first information report dated 12.10.2023, registered in Case Crime No. 498 of 2023, under Sections 363, 366 IPC, Police Station - Kotwali Fatehgarh, District - Farrukhabad and not arrest the petitioners pursuant to the said FIR.

¶3The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that both the petitioners are major. The date of birth of petitioner no. 1 - Smt. Anjali as per Adhar Card is 1.1.2002 and date of birth of petitioner no. 2 Vivek Kumar as per Aadhar Card is 8.7.2002 and as such both are married and they married to each other out of their own free will, as such no offence under Section 363 I.P.C. is made out.

¶4Per contra, learned AGA submits that the Aadhar Card is not an authentic proof and on the basis of Aadhar Card of the petitioner nos. 1 and 2, their age can not be relied.

¶5At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance upon a judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Suhani vs. State of U.P. reported in 2018 0 Supreme (SC) 1430 and judgement dated 18.7.2023 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 1898 of 2023 (P. Yuvaprakash vs. State Rep. by Inspector of Police) submits that in all such matters Hon'ble Apex Court has directed for age determination test of the girl.

¶6In view thereof, we direct that the petitioner no.1-Smt. Anjali be produced before the Magistrate concerned, for recording her statement under section 164(1) and (5) of Cr.P.C. and thereafter, she shall be brought before the Chief Medical Officer concerned by the I.O. of the case who shall constitute a panel of three doctors, for her age determination test (ossification test). Both these exercises must conclude on or before 11.12.2023 or within six weeks from today.

¶7It is incumbent upon the petitioners to provide all necessary assistance to the Investigation Officer during investigation, however, the petitioners shall not be arrested during this period.

¶8The arrest of the petitioners shall be subject to the 164 Cr.P.C. statement of the girl and her age.

¶9In the event, if it is found that she had attained the age of majority and her 164 Cr.P.C. statement favours the petitioner no. 2, then the petitioners shall not be arrested till the submission of report by the police under section 173(2) Cr.P.C. OTHERWISE, the procedure of law would follow against the petitioners and the protection given to the petitioners would automatically stands vacated.

¶10With this observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 28.10.2023 S.K.S. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad