Shripal Sahu and Another v. State of U.P

Court No. -64 Case :-CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. -40933 of 2023 Applicant :-Shripal Sahu And Another Opposite Party :-State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :-Gyanendra Singh,Diwakar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :-G.A. Hon'ble Siddharth,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the material placed on record. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants, Shripal Sahu and Rambaran Sahu with a prayer to release them on bail in Case Crime No. 02 of 2023, under Sections 323, 308, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station-Marka, District-Banda pendency of trial. The submission of the learned counsel for the applicants is that there are cross versions of the incident registered by both the parties. Injuries have been caused to both the parties. It cannot be ascertained at this stage which party was the aggressor. The applicants allege false implication in this case. The applicants are languishing in jail since 24.08.2023. In case he is enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicants by contending that the innocence of the applicants cannot be adjudged at pre-trial stage, therefore, they do not deserve any indulgence. In case the applicants are released on bail, they will again indulge in similar activities and will misuse the liberty of bail. Having considered the submissions of the parties noted above, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicants involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-

(i) The applicants shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses.

(ii) The applicants shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

(iii) The applicants shall remain present before the Trial Court on each date fixed, either personally or as directed by the Court. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

(iv) In case the applicants misuse the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure their presence, proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicants fail to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation then the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him in accordance with law under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

(v) The applicants shall remain present in person before the Trial Court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicants are deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. Order Date :- 27.10.2023 RPD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad