VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Suresh Pandey v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Dismissed on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
29 October 2023
Case no.
WRIC 37368/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 47 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37368 of 2023 Petitioner :- Suresh Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bhrigu Jee Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rameshwar Prasad Shukla Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

¶2This writ petition has been filed for following relief: "i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing/ commanding the respondent no. 3 to evict the Gaon Sabha land Gata No. 23/409 (Nai Parti) from respondent No. 5 which is situated in village Khirauli, Pargana Lakhneshwar, Tehsil Rasra, District-Ballia in pursuance of the order dated

28.03.2023 in Case No. 6277 of 2022 (Computerized Case No. T202215090406277) (Gaon Sabha Vs. Sher Bahadur) under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code-2006 pending before him expeditiously within a stipulated period as may specified by this Hon'ble Court."

¶3Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that on the application of the petitioner, orders have been passed under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, but the same are not been executed.

¶4A preliminary objection has been raised by learned Standing Counsel for the State that the writ petition is not maintainable for execution of orders passed by the Revenue Court in view of the judgment of Division Bench of this Court in case of Manbhavati Vs. State of U.P. and others reported in 2020 1 AWC 789A and Writ C No. 7863 of 2018 (Brij Bhushan Rai v. State of U.P. and 6 others).

¶5Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 30.10.2023 Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.