- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 29 October 2023
- Case no.
- A482 37629/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 86 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 37629 of 2023 Applicant :- Manoj Jadaun Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Prem Chandra Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
¶2This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant with the prayer to quash non-bailable warrant dated 16.12.2015 as well as entire proceedings of S.S.T. No. 153 and 154 of 2012 (State Vs. Manoj Jadaun and another), arising out of Case Crime No. 154 and 155 of 2012, under Section 307 IPC and Section 12 of D.A.A. and 25 of Arms Act, Police Station Fatehabad, District Agra, pending in the court of Additional District Judge-II, Agra.
¶3After some argument, learned counsel for the applicant has made a statement at the bar, on instructions, that he does not want to press other prayers made in the application and states that the applicant is ready to surrender before the court below and seek his bail and that his bail application be considered and disposed of in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51.
¶4Learned AGA states that he has no objection to the aforesaid prayer made by the counsel for the applicant for not pressing the other prayers made in the instant application.
¶5In view of the above, in case the applicant appears before the court below within ten days from today and applies for bail, his bail application be considered and disposed of expeditiously in accordance with law.
¶6With the aforesaid observations, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 30.10.2023 Subham High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.