- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 29 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 37463/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37463 of 2023 Petitioner :- Singh Raj Singh Respondent :- State Bank Of India And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Srivastava,Ashutosh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- Satish Chaturvedi Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Manoj Bajaj,J.
¶1Sri Sandeep Arora, learned counsel appearing for the Bank states that for the same relief for which the writ petition has been filed the petitioner has approached the Debts Recovery Tribunal by filing S.A. No. 367 of 2023 Singh Raj Singh vs. S.B.I. He, therefore, states that this writ petition be not entertained.
¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner does not deny the filing of the S.A. No. 367 of 2023 (Singh Raj Singh vs. S.B.I).
¶3Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are of the view that no interference is warranted.
¶4The writ petition is accordingly, dismissed. Order Date :- 30.10.2023 M.S. Ansari (Manoj Bajaj, J.) (Siddhartha Varma, J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.