- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 29 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 16709/2021
Judgment
Court No. - 10 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16709 of 2021 Petitioner :- P.S. Jain And 5 Others Respondent :- State Of U P And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Uma Nath Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anand Prakash Paul,Ram Bilas Yadav Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.
¶1Heard Shri Uma Nath Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Shri Ram Bilas Yadav, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 3.
¶2It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that bringing on record certain subsequent developments, supplementary affidavit has been filed by respondent No.3, and in the light of those developments, the cause of action to further press the present writ petition does not survive and the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous.
¶3All the learned counsel for the respondents, as referred to herein above, have no objection to the said prayer.
¶4Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 30.10.2023 Sazia High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.