- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 29 October 2023
- Case no.
- BAIL 44417/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 44 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 44417 of 2023 Applicant :- Babu Lal Chaurasiya Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Jai Prakash Singh,Raj Kiran Chaudhary Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
¶2The FIR in question was lodged alleging recovery of 130 gm of Alprazolam powder from the pocket of the trousers worn by the applicant. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that even as per the seizure memo, which on record, the recovery was not effected in the presence of any gazetted officer or a magistrate, which is clearly in conflict with the mandate of Section 50 of NDPS Act. He places reliance on a judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Mohd Muslim @ Hussain v. State (NCT of Delhi); 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 260.
¶3Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
¶4Considering the fact that prima-facie, the recovery is contrary to the mandate of Section 50 NDPS Act, there are reasons to believe that the prosecution against the applicant may not result in any conviction.
¶5As the applicant has no criminal antecedent of an offence under the NDPS Act, the second part of Section 37 NDPS Act also stands satisfied, thus, the applicant who is in custody since 22.06.2023 is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
¶6Let the applicant Babu Lal Chaurasiya be released on bail in FIR No.131 of 2023, under Section 8/22 of NDPS Act, P.S. GRP Cantt., District Varanasi on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;
(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and
(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. Order Date :- 30.10.2023 nishant High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.