VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Anil Kumar Srivastava v. State of U.P. and Another

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
29 October 2023
Case no.
A482 7311/2002

Judgment

Court No. - 69 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7311 of 2002 Applicant :- Anil Kumar Srivastava Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pradeep Chandra,Asha Parihar,Geeta Parihar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,K.L. Grover,Ramesh Singh Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.

¶1List revised.

¶2No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this application despite the fact that there are three learned counsels appearing in the matter even when the matter has been taken up in the revised list. Sri K.L. Grover and Sri Ramesh Singh, learned counsels for the opposite party no. 2 are also not present. Sri Ajay Singh, learned A.G.A.-I for the State is present.

¶3The present Criminal Misc. Application U/S 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the following prayers:- "It is, therefore, Most Respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash the order dated 27.7.2002 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate,Ist Court No.6 Jhansi in Case Crime No. 534/2001, under Section 409/420/467/468/471 I.P.C. Police Station Sipri Bazar, district Jhansi Arurag Raman Sharma Vs. Anil Kumar otherwise the applicant shall suffer irreparable loss. It is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to stay the operation of the impugned order dated 27.07.2002 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate,Ist Court No.6 Jhansi and also to stay the arrest of the applicant in Case Crime No. 534/2001, under Section 409/420/467/468/471 I.P.C. Police Station Sipri Bazar, district Jhansi Arurag Raman Sharma Vs. Anil Kumar, during the pendency of present 482 petition before this Hon'ble Court, otherwise the applicant shall suffer irreparable loss and injury."

¶4Records show that there was an interim order passed in the matter on 19.8.2002 which was extended on certain dates.

¶5Since there is no representation from the side of the applicant even in the revised call, the present application is dismissed in non-prosecution.

¶6Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

¶7Office to communicate this order to concerned trial court within three weeks. (Samit Gopal,J.) Order Date :- 30.10.2023 Naresh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.