VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Mohd. Umair v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Dismissed on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
29 October 2023
Case no.
WRIC 24941/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 51 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 24941 of 2023 Petitioner :- Mohd. Umair Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rameshwar Prasad Shukla Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.

¶1Heard Mr. Vinay Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Abhishek Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent-Gram Sabha.

¶2In compliance of the order of this Court dated 6.10.2023, instruction dated 25.10.2023 is placed before the Court by learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents, which is taken on record.

¶3Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel on the basis of instruction dated 25.10.2023 submitted that the plot in dispute i.e. 133 area 0.723 hectare is recorded as pond in the revenue records. He further submitted that C.H. Forms 41 & 45 also demonstrate that the plot in dispute is recorded as pond. He next submitted that the fisheries lease has been executed in favour of one, Reeta wife of Sanjay for 10 years on 21.10.2023, as such, no cause of action survives in the matter and the writ petition is liable to be dismissed.

¶4In reply, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the suit for injunction filed by the Gaon Sabha was decreed by the trial Court on

13.10.1958 but in appeal the decree of the trial Court has been set aside and the suit filed by the Gaon Sabha has been dismissed. He further submitted that the pond in question is the private pond of the petitioner, as such, the same cannot be auctioned by the state authorities under U.P. Revenue Code,2006 and the rules framed there under.

¶5I have considered the argument advanced by learned counsel for the parties and perused the records.

¶6There is no dispute about the fact that Plot No. 133 area 0.0723 hectare is recorded as pond and 10 years fisheries lease has been executed in respect to the plot no.133 in favour of one Reeta wife of Sanjay.

¶7the perusal of instruction dated 25.10.2023 sent by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Sagari, Azamgarh will be necessary which are as under:- "पेषक, oooooooooउपजजलाजधकारी ooooooooसगडीeआजमगढ। सेवाeमे, oooooooमुखयeसथायीeअजधवका oooooooमा०eउचचeनयायालय,eeइलाहाबाद। संखया/रा०जल० 78eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeवदनांकः-25eअकटूबर,2023 ववषयः-eमा०eउचचeनयायालय,इलाहाबादeमeे योजजतeररटeयावचकाeसंखयाe24941/2023eमो०eउमैरeबनामeसटेटeआफ यू०पी०eवeअनयeमeे वांवछतeअनुदेशe(Instruction)eदाजखलeकरनेeके eसमबनधeमे। महोदय, कपयाeउपयरकeववषयकeमेeअपनेeफै कसeकाeसंदभरeगहणeकरनेeकाeकषeकरे,eजजसमेeमा०eउचचeनयायालयeमeे योजजतeजसववलृ ु ररटeयावचकाeसंखयाe24941/2023eमो०eउमैरeबनामeसटेटeआफeयू०पी०eवeअनयeमेeअनुदेशe(Instruction)eदाजखल वकयेeजानेeहेतुeवनदरवशतeवकयाeगयाeह।ै eउकeके eसमादरeमेeवांवछतeअनुदेशe(Instruction)eवनमनवत्eह।ै यहeवकeगामeजहीरदीनपुरeपरगनाeवeतहसीलeसगडीeजनपदeआजमगढeकीeखतौनीeसन्e1425eसेe1430 फ०eके eखाता े ेसंखयाe 00146 eमe अंवकतeगाटाe संखयाe 133 eरकबाe 0.723 eहे०eजोe पोखरीe के e नामeअवभलेखeमe अंवकतeहै, eजो जो०च०आ०पतe41eवe45eमेeभीeपोखरीeके eखातेeमेeअंवकतeह।ै eउदरणeखतौनीeवeजो०च०आ०पतe 41eवe45eकी छायापवतeसंलगeह।ै यहeवकeउकeपोखरीeके e10eवषरयeमतसयeपालनeआवंटनeहेतुeदवै नकeसमाचारeपतeमeे ववजव्eपकावशतeकरनेeके eउपरांत ेवनधार रतeवतजथe11.11.2022eकोeनायबeतहसीलदारeवबलररयागंजeकीeअधयकताeमeनीलामीeकरायीeगयी। यहeवकeनीलामीeके eउपरानतeपतावलीeमेeसंलगeमा०eनयायालयeपथमeअवतररकeजसववलeजजeआजमगढeअपीलeनं० 751/1956eनूरeमोहममदeवeअनयeबनामeगामeसभाeता०फै ०e13.08.1958eकीeपमावणतeपवत,eजजसमेeनूरeमोहममदeआवद कीeअपीलeसवीकारeकरतेeहहएeअवरeनयायालयeके eआदेशeएवंeवडቅीeकोeअपीलीयeनयायालयeदाराeवनरसतeकरतेeहहएeपोकरी कोeखदु कासतeकीeआराजीeमानतेeहहएeनूरeमोहममदeआवदeकीeभूवमधरीeमानाeहै,eवकनतुeसन्e1358/1359eकीeखतौनीeतक वववावदतeगाटाeसंखयाe133eपोखरीeके eखातेeमेeदजरeहै,eजोeवतरमानeखतौनीeवeजो०च०आ०पतe41eवe45eमेeभीeपोखरी खातेeमeे ह।ै eउकeपोखरीeके eमतसयeपालनeआवंटनeसवीकृ वतeके eसंबंधeमeे कायारलयeके eपतeसंखयाe43/एस०टी०eवदनांक

08.05.2023eके eदाराeजजलाeशासकीयeअजधवकाe(जसववल)eदाराeमतसयeपालनeआवंटनeसवीकृ वतeपदानeवकयेeजानेeहेतु ववजधकeरायeदीeगयी।eतदोपरानतeउकeपोखरीeकीeसवारजधकeबोलीeकतारeरीताeपतनीeसंजयeवनवासीeगामeजहीरदीनपुरeके पकeमेe10eवषरयeमतसयeपालनeआवंटनeवदनांकe21.10.2023eकोeसवीकतeवकयाeगयाeह।ै eमतसयeपालनeआवंटनeसवीकवतृ ृ आदेशeकीeपवतeसंलगeह।ै e अतःeमहोदयeसेeसादरeअनुरोधeहeै वकeमा०eउचचeनयायालयeके eसमकeवसतुeबसथवतeसेeअवगतeकरानेeकाeकषeकर।े भवदीय (अतुलeगु्ा) उपजजलाजधकारी सगडी,आजमगढ। संखयाe/eतदe् वदनांक पवतजलवपः-eशीeरमेशeयादवeलेखपाल,eतहसील-सगडी,eआजमगढeकोeइसeवनदरशeके eसाथeवकeससमयeमखु यeसथायीe अजधवका,मा०eउचचeनयायालय,eइलाहाबादeसेeसमपकर eकरeसंदवभरतeयावचकाeमेeअनुदेशeदाजखलeकरानाeसुवनबशचतeकर।े उपजजललजधकलरर सगडर,आजमगढ।"

¶8In the view of the execution of fisheries lease executed on 21.10.2023 in favour of one Reeta wife of Sanjay, petitioner is not entitled to the relief claimed in the writ petition rather petitioner can avail remedy under Rule-59 of U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 in respect to the lease executed on

21.10.2023.

¶9The writ petition is dismissed accordingly. Order Date :- 30.10.2023 Rameez High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.