- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 29 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 37170/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 47 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37170 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ram Palat Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Neelam Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rameshwar Prasad Shukla Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.
¶2The present petition has been filed with the following prayer: "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 3 to decide the case no. T202315510403235 (State Vs. Sarkar) along with other related cases expeditiously within stipulated period as soon as possible."
¶3Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the proceedings under Section 38(2)of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 are pending since 2022, but the opposite parties have not put in their appearance before the court below.
¶4From perusal of the order sheet, annexed as Annexure No. 5 to the writ petition, it appears that several dates have been fixed by the Court concerned, however, till date, the aforesaid case has not been decided.
¶5No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
¶6Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No. 3 Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Mohammdabad Gohna, District-Mau to consider and decide the aforementioned case, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 30.10.2023 Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.