Mohd. Imran v. State of U.P. and 6 Others

Court No. - 47 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37242 of 2023 Petitioner :- Mohd. Imran Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ruksana Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

¶2The writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 and 3 to comply the order dated

17.08.2023 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division/ Judicial Magistrate, Charkhari Mahoba in Original Suit No. 112 of 2023 (Mohd. Imran Vs. Ram Kishan and others) within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court.

(ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 4 to 7 to maintain the status quo upon the land no. 565/656 area 0.140 hectare during pendency of the Original Suit No. 112 of 2023 (Mohd. Imran Vs. Ram Kishan and others).

(iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pass a suitable order in favour of petitioner and against respondents who did not remove Chabutara from Gram Sabha land."

¶3Learned Standing Counsel raised a preliminary objection that by means of this writ petition, the petitioner wants to get the orders passed by Civil Court enforced by making applications to the revenue authorities and the dispute is between the petitioner and the private respondents.

¶4In view of the above, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter.

¶5Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the remedy as available to him under law. Order Date :- 30.10.2023 Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad