Sangeeta v. State of U.P. and 6 Others

Court No. - 39 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35443 of 2023 Petitioner :- Sangeeta Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Akhilesh Kumar Singh,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- CSC,Om Prakash Yadav Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J. Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.

¶1Heard Shri D.P. Singh, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Akhilesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner Shri H.N. Singh, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Om Prakash Yadav, learned counsel for the respondents and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. ,2. Undisputedly, against the order dated 13.7.2023 passed by the Secretary, District Level Caste Scrutiny Committee, Ballia, the petitioner has a remedy of appeal before the Regional Level Caste Scrutiny Committee. The limitation to file appeal exists.

¶3Accordingly, we decline to interfere with the order in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in face of the alternative remedy of appeal.

¶4The writ petition is disposed of with the observation that in case such appeal is filed within a period of two weeks from today, the same may be decided, strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible within the timelines provided under the governing Government Order. Order Date :- 30.10.2023 Sumaira (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad