Arimardan Singh v. State of U.P. and 9 Others

Court No. - 47 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37272 of 2023 Petitioner :- Arimardan Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kunwar Mayank Singh,Ambrish Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Azad Rai Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

¶2The present petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- "A. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the order dated 22.03.2023 passed by respondent no. 2 in Appeal No. 1532 of 2022, Arimardan Singh Vs. Ramgopal and others. B. Issue a writ order or Direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondent No. 2 to stay the effect and operation of the order dated 06.12.2022 passed by Respondent No. 3 in Case No. 3867 of 2021 (Computer Case No. T202102250203867), Ramgopal and others Vs. Arimardan Singh and Others, during pendency of the Appeal No. 1532 of 2022 (Computer Case No. C202202000001532), Arimardan Singh Versus Ramgopal and others pending before the Respondent No. 2. C. Issue a writ order or Direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the Respondent Nos. 5 to 10 to maintain status quo over the plots in dispute during the pendency of the Appeal No. 1532 of 2022 (Computer Case No. C202202000001532), Arimardan Singh Versus Ramgopal and others pending before the Respondent No. 2."

¶3Learned Standing Counsel has raised preliminary objection that against the order impugned, the petitioner has a remedy of filing second appeal as well as a revision before the Board of Revenue, under the provisions of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.

¶4In view of the same, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter.

¶5Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy as available to him under the provisions of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. Order Date :- 30.10.2023 Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad