- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 29 October 2023
- Case no.
- FAFO 1993/2005
Judgment
Court No. - 2 Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 1993 of 2005 Appellant :- Daya Sugar Respondent :- Smt. Machheda Devi And Another Counsel for Respondent :- A.K. Aditya,Naresh Chandra Tripahti,Ramesh Pundir,Rekha Pundir Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. Pursuant to the order of this Court dated 13.07.2023, notice was issued to the appellant to engage another counsel. As per office report dated 28.10.2023, neither any vakalatnama nor unserved notice has been received in the office as yet. Therefore, service of notice upon appellant is deemed to be sufficient. No one appears on behalf of the appellant even in the revised call. It appears that by the afflux of time the appellant has lost interest in pursuing the case. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Order Date :- 30.10.2023 R.S. Tiwari High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.