Sadhu and Another v. State of U.P

Court No. - 44 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 45797 of 2023 Applicant :- Sadhu And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Dhirendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA and perused the record.

¶2The applicants were earlier enlarged on bail, however, as the applicants were labourers, they went out of the State to pursue their profession. Subsequently, on account of non-appearance, non-bailable warrants were issued and the applicants have been apprehended. Counsel for the applicants states that the applicants shall co-operate with the trial.

¶3Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.

¶4In view of the aforesaid statement, the applicants are entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.

¶5Let the applicants Sadhu and Juganu be released on bail in FIR No.433 of 2010, under Section 3(1) of U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, P.S. Gorakhnath, District Gorakhpur on their furnishing a personal bond each with two fresh sureties of Rs.30,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

(a) The applicants shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

(b) The applicants shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which they are accused or suspected of the commission; and

(c) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. Order Date :- 31.10.2023 nishant High Court of Judicature at Allahabad