VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sumit Kumar v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
30 October 2023
Case no.
BAIL 45826/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 44 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 45826 of 2023 Applicant :- Sumit Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Hari Bans Singh,Dharm Jeet Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

¶2The FIR in question was lodged as a missing person report. Subsequently, on recovery, the victim stated that she was knowing one Rahul Paswwan for the last 8 years and they had got married on 14.12.2020 and thereafter on 22.02.2023 she had gone alongwith Rahul to Mumbai. In the statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C., she made a slight diversion and stated that three persons namely Rahul, Sumit (present applicant) and Janu had taken her to Ballia station and thereafter, she had gone with Rahul and thereafter she married Rahul and formed physical relations with him.

¶3Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.

¶4Considering the fact that the applicant was neither named in the FIR nor in the statement under section 161 Cr.P.C., and his name surfaced for the first time in statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. that too without there being any allegation of use of force against the applicant, the applicant who is in custody since 04.08.2023 and has no criminal antecedent, is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.

¶5Let the applicant Sumit Kumar be released on bail in FIR No.102 of 2023, under Section 363, 366A IPC & Section 16/17 of POCSO Act, P.S. Bariya, District Ballia on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. Order Date :- 31.10.2023 nishant High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.